Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin vs Paloma Goldsmith Weinreich Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L L W W L
Form
L W L L W L W W L LHead-To-Head: Elkin 1 - 0 Weinreich
They have played 2 sets in total, with Elkin winning 2 and Weinreich winning 0. The last match between Elkin and Weinreich was at the W15 Recife, 25-05-2023, Second, Clay with Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin | 1 |
| Paloma Goldsmith Weinreich | 0 |
W15 Recife(25-05-2023)
| Elkin | Stats | Weinreich |
|---|---|---|
| 31% (4-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 886 | Ranking | N/A |
| 867 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 26 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 35% (37-69) | Career Total W/L | 44% (17-22) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Paloma Goldsmith Weinreich
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:2:0 | Average Match Time | 1:2:0 |
| 50% (25/50) | 1st Serve % | 56% (20/36) |
| 88% (22/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (12/20) |
| 56% (14/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (5/16) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 53% (19/36) | Return Points Win % | 28% (14/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Fernanda Labrana
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Lourdes Ayala
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
52%
(
37 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 0-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Juliana Rodriguez
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolin Raschdorf
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
0
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 2-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaitlyn Leigh Ramduth
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
73
|
0-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Coco Bosman
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Paloma Goldsmith Weinreich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Martina Capurro Taborda
Player
Paloma Goldsmith Weinreich
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
22 of
35)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Alessandra Caceres
Player
Paloma Goldsmith Weinreich
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
48%
(
31 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paloma Goldsmith Weinreich
Player
Mariana Soares
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
11
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
24%
(
5 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
54%
(
34 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35% (37/69) | Win/Loss | 44% (17/22) |
| 38% (90/147) | Sets Win/Loss | 43% (36/48) |
| 44% (914/1153) | Games Win/Loss | 46% (354/412) |
| 29% (15/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) |
| 42% (22/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 46% (16/19) |
| 0% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 104 | Aces Total | 6 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 359 | Total Double Faults | 96 |
| 1:4:25 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 319.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 199.46 |
| 59% (2591/4396) | 1st Serve % | 63% (612/972) |
| 55% (1427/2591) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (302/612) |
| 41% (747/1805) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (123/360) |
| 49% (220/449) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (61/135) |
| 43% (1797/4208) | Return Points Win % | 46% (453/993) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 34% (25/48) | Challenger W/L | 33% (4/8) |
| 36% (12/21) | Futures W/L | 46% (12/14) |
| 35% (37/106) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (17/39) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (5/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 36% (9/25) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 79% (43/34) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (16/14) |
| 21% (43/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (16/2) |
| 5% (63/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (23/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
